Supervisor Field Guide – Sodak
Sodak

Supervisor Field Guide

Changing at-risk to reduced-risk behaviour

How to use this guide

Work through each step when you spot an at-risk behaviour. Tap to open, add your notes as you go, then copy everything at the end.

Before anything can change, you need to describe the behaviour precisely. Vague labels can’t be fixed. A pinpointed behaviour can.

Label vs pinpointed ✗ “He’s being careless”
✓ “He skipped the pre-task check and started without confirming PPE was in place”
Check yourself
Could I see it or hear it?
Would someone else watching agree with my description?
What is the specific reduced-risk behaviour I want instead?
Have you described the reduced-risk behaviour with the worker so you both agree on what “right” looks like?

That behaviour happened for a reason. Something in the environment made it easier, quicker, or more natural than the safe alternative. Your job is to find what — not to blame.

Watch for Fundamental Attribution ErrorIf your first thought is “they just didn’t bother” — look again. The environment almost always contributed. What in the setup made the at-risk option the path of least resistance?
Check the 6 task ingredients
TaskToolsMaterials TimePeersSupervisor
Is the correct way actually more difficult than the at-risk way?
Were the wrong tools or materials available and easier to use?
Were there perceived time pressures making the shortcut feel necessary?
Were they copying the behaviour of those around them?
Are they only compliant when you are there?
What is in it for them to do it the reduced-risk way?

The reduced-risk behaviour didn’t happen. The performance equation tells you why — and which one thing to fix first.

The performance equation
Performance = (Ability + Motivation) − Obstacles
Ability

Do they actually know how? Have they seen the reduced-risk way done properly? Are they confident doing it?

Motivation

Is there any upside for doing it right? Do they get acknowledged? Or does work just move on without a word?

Obstacles

What physically gets in the way? Is the safe option slower, harder, further away, or under time pressure?

Fix one

Identify the weakest link. Fix that one first — don’t try to address all three at once.

Don’t lecture. Ask open questions and let them talk. The person doing the job usually knows exactly what’s getting in the way — you just haven’t asked yet.

Be curious, not confrontationalCuriosity gets you the real reason. Confrontation gets you defence — and you’ve learned nothing.
Questions to try
Walk me through how you did that — what were you thinking at the time?
What would make it easier to do it the safer way?
What was going on around you when it happened?
What’s one thing we could change to make this less likely again?

Agree on one specific change — something in the environment, not just a promise to “try harder”.

The at-risk behaviour happened because something in the environment supported it. Use these four questions to design a change that makes the safe choice the natural choice.

What would make it easier?

Move the right tool closer. Remove a step. Cut the friction. Make the reduced-risk way the path of least resistance — not the hardest option.

What would make it worth doing?

Focus on the behaviour you want, not the one you don’t. Frame it positively. Is there any recognition or acknowledgement for doing it right?

What are others around them doing?

Peer behaviour is powerful. Can you show that most people do it the right way? Could a public acknowledgement shift the norm for the whole team?

When is the best moment?

Brief people before the task, not after. Prompt at the point of decision. Reinforce immediately — not in next week’s meeting.

Pick one question, find one answer, make one change. Big change is never big at the start.

When the reduced-risk behaviour happens — even once — say something. Specifically. Immediately. That feedback is what conditions the behaviour to stick.

Behaviour that gets noticed becomes more likely. Behaviour that gets ignored fades. Reinforce what you want more of.
What good reinforcement sounds like
“I noticed you did the pre-task check before starting — that’s exactly what I want to see. Cheers.”
“Good call stopping when you weren’t sure — that’s the right instinct.”
“That’s the right way to handle that. Keep doing it like that.”

Specific, sincere, and soon after the behaviour. It doesn’t need to be big.

Go further — shift the norm
Could you acknowledge the good behaviour in front of others — making it visible that this is how the team does things?
Can you ask the worker to share what worked with a colleague — making it a commitment to others, not just to you?

Go back and look. Did the environment change? Is the behaviour shifting? Your follow-up signals that this matters — and is itself a form of reinforcement.

Questions to close the loop
Did the change we agreed on actually happen?
Have you gone back to the worker and asked how it is going — do they think it is working?
Am I still seeing the at-risk behaviour — or is it reducing?
Is this pattern showing up elsewhere? Could the fix be shared with other supervisors?
Does this need a BIA session to be properly designed out?
Record what you observed as an AR/RR data point. That data drives the bigger picture — it’s what your manager and the safety team use to drive the next conversation up the chain.

All 7 steps complete

The behaviour is pinpointed, the environment is changing, and the data is logged. That’s how it shifts — one conversation at a time.

Your notes